Issuance & effective control
Do supply, minting, freezing, roles, upgrades and signature controls match relevant representations and approved rules?
DISPUTE TECHNICAL ANALYSIS & EXPERT SUPPORT
Turn promises and actions
into reviewable technical facts.
Support dispute-resolution law firms, forensic specialists, liquidators and forensic accountants. Analyse defined questions, historical versions and key transactions without presupposing the outcome.
PRIORITY QUESTIONS
Start with three contract categories.
Vesting & distributions
Were the relevant amounts actually locked? Were releases accelerated, beneficiaries changed or calculation bases and ratios modified?
Conditional payments & refunds
Were delivery and release conditions met? How was a failed raise handled? Did receipts and refunds follow the agreed rules?
FOUR LAYERS OF FACT
Separate technical findings
from legal responsibility.
Technical capability
What a specified version and configuration allow a party to do. A capability is not evidence that it was exercised.
Observed behaviour
What occurred at the relevant time and which states changed. A reproduction is not automatically a historical fact.
Attribution
Linking an address to a person or institution requires lawfully obtained authority, account and other evidence—not an address alone.
Liability & loss
Technical and calculation support informs counsel, adjudicators and appropriate professionals; it does not itself determine breach, crime or loss causation.
ILLUSTRATIVE METHOD / NOT A CLIENT CASE
How do we examine a representation?
This synthetic example illustrates the method. It is not a client case, test result or court endorsement.
QUESTION
“The team allocation is locked for 24 months.”
First identify covered addresses, amounts, start date and contractual exceptions.
- Documents: vesting terms and relevant versions.
- System: vesting, roles, proxies and beneficiary settings.
- History: releases, upgrades and configuration changes.
- Report: distinguish observations, reproductions, assumptions and open questions.
ENGAGEMENT OPTIONS
Scope what can be verified before going deeper.
| Service | Indicative budget and scope |
|---|---|
| CF-D-CASE · Case scoping | USD 3,000–5,000; one supported chain, one scenario, up to three questions and 20 rules. 5–7 working days. |
| CF-A-DISPUTE · Focused fact analysis | USD 10,000–25,000; initial reference scope of up to five related contracts, three questions and ten specified key transactions. Historical window and versions are separately fixed. 2–3 weeks. |
| CF-A-EXPERT · Expert and procedural support | Separately quoted and appointed, with named personnel, independence, procedural, sign-off and attendance arrangements. |
BEFORE SHARING MATERIALS
Check conflicts and confidentiality
before exchanging case materials.
Use an anonymised overview for first contact. Do not send private keys, seed phrases, identity documents, full case files or information you are not authorised to disclose.
- Up to three core questions and the intended use.
- Chain, related contracts, relevant period and key transactions.
- Availability of contracts, disclosures and code versions.
- Instructing and paying parties, and authorised report recipients.
- Local procedure, deadlines, conflicts and preservation arrangements.
REVIEWABLE EVIDENCE
Every conclusion needs a basis and a boundary.
01
Scope
Questions, versions, time and authority.
02
Reconstruct
Historical implementation, configuration and transactions.
03
Analyse
Mapping, reconciliation and controlled reproduction.
04
Review
Facts, inferences and alternative explanations.
05
Deliver
Report, evidence index and sign-off.
YOUR NEXT STEP
Bring one question that needs to be clarified.
Development, review, dispute analysis or professional collaboration—tell us the outcome you need, without sharing confidential materials first.